What Are You Running From?—Seneca and Socrates on Solitude
Dying Every Day (Day 147)
💀 Dying Every Day
Dying Every Day is a podcast by the Perennial Leader Project. Each episode turns a selected passage from Stoic philosophy into a guided meditation designed to help you (and me) learn how to live.
Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
What Are You Running From?—Seneca and Socrates on Solitude
Welcome to Dying Every Day. This is Day 147.
“I am not yet able, as the Delphic inscription has it, to know myself; so it seems to me ridiculous, when I do not yet know that, to investigate irrelevant things.”
— Socrates, via Plato’s Phaedrus
Hold that word—ridiculous.
Socrates is not being modest. He is saying something he believed with complete seriousness: that without self-knowledge, every other investigation a person undertakes is built on sand. That the myths, the cosmologies, the political theories, the debates about the nature of the gods—all of it is irrelevant until the prior work is done.
And the prior work is not done. He is not done. After a lifetime of asking, in conversation with everyone Athens had to offer, the man who gave his life to the examined life says: “I have not yet managed to know myself.”
“Know thyself,” the words inscribed at the entrance to the Temple of Apollo at Delphi. Not know the world. Not know the gods. Know yourself—and understand that until you do, everything else you investigate is a distraction from the only question that finally matters.
The question this meditation wants to sit with is not whether you know yourself. It is whether you have given yourself any real opportunity to find out. And beneath that, what you believe self-knowledge is actually for.
For this reason, Seneca advised Lucilius to “withdraw into yourself as much as you can.” He wrote these words in a letter about the danger of crowds, of what happens to the self when it is constantly surrounded by noise and people and stimulation. His warning is not against other people as such. It is against a particular condition: the self that has never been alone with itself long enough to know what it actually is.
The self that exists only in reaction to the world—shaped by whatever and whoever happened to be nearby, wanting what the crowd wants, fearing what the crowd fears—is not really a self at all.
It is a collection of responses.
A set of habits that arrived without being chosen.
It’s important to remember that solitude is not a rejection of the world but a practice—a deliberate return to the interior, where the only voice is your own.
But withdraw toward what? The “withdrawal” Seneca recommends is ultimately a retreat into the hours of your own life, reclaimed from the crowd that would otherwise spend them for you. The crowd leaves its mark whether you notice or not. Spend enough time in it, and you find yourself living a life you never quite decided to live—shaped by its pressures, its distractions, its definitions of what matters—without ever having stopped long enough to ask whether any of it is actually yours.
For Seneca and Socrates, self-knowledge is not an abstract philosophical achievement. It is practical and urgent.
You withdraw into yourself in order to recover the life that is slipping away—to examine what you actually believe, what you actually value, what you are actually doing with the time that is genuinely yours.
The crowd makes that examination impossible, not because it is malicious, but because it is constant. But why? Why is the crowd so appealing, the noise so preferable to silence, and the busyness so much easier to sustain than the withdrawal Seneca recommends?
Interestingly, Blaise Pascal famously answered that question:
“All of humanity’s problems stem from man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” — Pensées
Pascal was a seventeenth-century French mathematician, physicist, and philosopher—one of the most brilliant minds of his century. And what he found, when he turned his attention from mathematics to the human condition, was a single condition underlying almost every form of human suffering.
Not laziness. Not malice. Not ignorance.
The inability to sit quietly in a room alone.
Notice the word he uses. Not unwillingness. Not failure. Inability. Pascal is not making a moral judgment. He is making a diagnosis. And what he is diagnosing is something more fundamental than distraction or busyness—a deep, almost constitutional incapacity to be present with one’s own interior life.
Why? Because the silence is not empty.
That is the thing Pascal understood that the others only approached. The reason people cannot sit quietly in a room alone is not that there is nothing there. It is that there is something there, and what they would find may not be what they expected or wanted.
The crowd is not merely a distraction. It is a refuge. A place to hide from the self that would surface in the silence.
Every obligation accepted, every notification answered, every hour filled with the appearance of productivity—these are not simply failures of discipline. They are, at some level, a flight. From what Seneca calls the withdrawal. From what Socrates called the only investigation worth undertaking.
Pascal continues—and this is where the diagnosis becomes more precise:
“We almost never think of the present, and if we do think of it, it is only to see what light it throws on our plans for the future. The present is never our end. Thus we never actually live, but hope to live, and since we are always planning how to be happy, it is inevitable that we should never be so.”
We never actually live, but hope to live.
This is not a description of the idle or the careless. It is a description of the busy. The productive. The people who are always moving, always planning, always preparing for the life they intend to inhabit once the current obligations have been discharged, which they never quite are.
The person who cannot sit quietly in a room alone cannot live in the present. Because the present is exactly what the flight from solitude is a flight from. The noise, the crowd, the endless forward motion—these keep the present at bay, keep the self from having to look at what is actually here, what is actually true, what has actually been chosen, and what has simply accumulated.
And so they never actually live.
They hope to live.
They plan to live.
They intend, when the time is right, to examine the life they are living. But the time is never quite right, and the examination never quite happens, and the years pass in a manner that Seneca named: “before we knew it was passing.”
This is what self-knowledge is for. Not as an abstract philosophical achievement. Not as a private consolation. But as the only alternative to hoping to live while your actual life goes unexamined beside you.
Socrates knew himself well enough to die for his convictions—to stand in front of a jury that was offering him his life in exchange for his silence. Seneca withdrew in order to recover the time that was genuinely his and spend it on what actually mattered. And Pascal sat quietly in a room and found God.
Different destinations from the same practice. Which raises the question this meditation has been guiding you to: What are you withdrawing toward?
Not just what you are withdrawing from—the crowd, the noise, the obligations that fill every hour. But toward. What is waiting for you in the silence that you have not yet had the courage or the leisure to find?
To revisit our opening passage:
“I am not yet able, as the Delphic inscription has it, to know myself; so it seems to me ridiculous, when I do not yet know that, to investigate irrelevant things.”
Socrates said this near the end of his life, after decades of the most rigorous self-examination his world had produced. He was not done. He knew he was not done. And that knowledge—that the investigation is never finished, that the withdrawal is not a one-time exercise but a daily discipline, and that the room we cannot sit in quietly is the one we most need to enter, again and again.
Daily Practice
Find twenty minutes today. Not at your desk, not with your phone, not with music or a podcast or anything that fills the silence before it can speak.
Sit. Alone. Quietly.
Don’t meditate in any formal sense. Don’t journal. Don’t try to be productive in the silence. Simply notice what arrives when nothing else does. Notice what your mind moves toward when there is nothing to move toward. Notice what surfaces when the noise stops—what you have been too busy, too distracted, or perhaps too afraid to hear.
And when you find it—whatever it is— ask this question:
Is this what I would choose if I were choosing deliberately, with full awareness of the time I am spending and what I am spending it on?
That question, asked honestly in the silence, is the beginning of the examined life. Begin there.
Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
—
Thank you for reading/listening; I hope you found something useful.
Until next time, be wise and be well.
J.W.
P.S. Catch up on recent (and past) meditations in the archive!